Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Bexhill College
Sponsored by
 
 
Wednesday, 3rd December 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Gambling with our money



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
03 October 2008
'RISK / reward' is a term commonly used in the business world.
Most entrepreneurs know sometimes you have to take a gamble to reap the long term benefits.

But taking the plunge with £3.5 million of tax payers money is an awfully big risk – especially for elected individuals.

That is what critics have accused Rother councillors of doing by provisionally freeing up funding from the capital reserves on Monday for the Next Wave seafront project.

The council has been accused of using a 'cart before the horse' approach in some circles by approving money and granting planning permission before completing a marketing exercise or public consultation.

Members tell us this was necessary to have the chance of gaining crucial external funding through the bidding process.

But that did little to calm the fears of a vocal minority of councillors, who feel Rother could be playing regeneration Russian roulette with public funds.

The council will either stand or fall by its decision.

Rother leader Cllr Carl Maynard could well be proved right – sometimes taking the plunge can pay off.

The plan is for investors to be found and for the scheme to have a chain reaction, encouraging more money and business to the area.

And Cllr Maynard is correct, going forward with an exciting programme has been seen to work elsewhere in the region and country.

But success can never be guaranteed, especially in the current economic climate.

The leader and other supporters of the scheme remind us the money is provisional and any risk can be mitigated by the marketing exercise and public consultation due to begin soon.

That is true, but only if those safeguards are paid attention to.

If the business case doesn't stack up after research, then responsible local government should see it dropped or radically altered.

If the public, part-investors in the plan after all, have strong majority comments on aspects of the scheme, then Rother should listen.

The Observer will be making sure councillors do pay attention and limit the role of chance in the equation.

If Rother do things correctly, they will be loading the dice in their favour.

But as any city trader will tell you, for every person who shook the dice and made his millions, there's a man who rolled snake-eyes.

The full article contains 386 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 October 2008 7:53 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Bexhill
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.