Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 20th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Bexhill back on the rise



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
16 July 2007
Bexhill emphatically got back to winnings ways in Division Two of the Sussex Cricket League on Saturday.
Chris Topp's fifth-placed side romped home by 125 runs against bottom-of-the-table St James's Montefiore at The Polegrove.

Bexhill rattled up 238-7 after being invited to bat, 93 of which came from the hard-hitting Richard May off only 74 balls.

St James's never recovered from slumping to 14-2 in reply and were eventually bowled out for 113 in 33.5 overs with Ian Ellis taking 4-39.
Sixth-placed Sidley were unable to build on another decent batting display as they were beaten at home to Chichester Priory Park in the same division.

Scott Woodroffe's charges made 224 after winning the toss, Peter King leading the way with 92 in the middle order.

But third-placed Chichester reached their target in a mere 37.1 overs largely thanks to an opening stand of 176 between Daniel Oliver (74) and Mark Bamford (125 not out).

The full article contains 172 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 July 2007 10:42 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Bexhill
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.